31.3.2010
Steel segment:
Mining segment:
Alexander Frolov, Chief Executive of Evraz Group, commented:
"The year 2009 proved challenging for Evraz and the global steel industry in general. We were particularly affected by the contraction of the Russian construction sector and the slow-down in infrastructure spending in the markets where our production facilities are located: North America, Europe and South Africa.
"At the onset of the international economic reversal, management developed and executed an action plan specifically designed to reduce the Company's cost base and reinforce the balance sheet. We have delivered on all our priorities and I am confident that the Company had significantly strengthened its operating base.
"Our Russian steelmaking operations have been running at full capacity since 1 July 2009 on the back of improved demand for steel products from South East Asia, the Middle East and North Africa. This, together with increased prices, helped to raise our EBITDA margin from 10% in the first half of 2009 to 15% in the second half."
Giacomo Baizini, Evraz Group's Chief Financial Officer, commented:
"Our net loss of US$1,261 million for 2009 reflects the global softness of steel markets. In order to aid comparison with previous years' results, however it should be noted that in the absence of the effect of the revaluation of certain asset classes due to the change in accounting policy under IAS16, the net loss would have amounted to US$207 million. This change resulted in additional depreciation of US$558 million (net of income tax effect of US$148 million) due to higher asset values, a loss from the revaluation deficit of US$420 million (net of income tax effect of US$144 million) recognised on the date of revaluation, and an additional impairment loss on goodwill of US$76 million (nil income tax effect).
"Prices for semi-finished and finished products have been rising steadily since the second quarter of 2009 in line with higher raw material prices. Due to significant scale of our vertical integration (2H2009: 96% self-coverage in iron ore and 74% self-coverage in coking coal excluding the Raspadskaya stake or 117% including the Raspadskaya stake) integrated EBITDA margins increased, although further gains in the fourth quarter of 2009 were limited by global increases in scrap prices.
"In a rising price environment we are subject to a short-term time lag due to the fact that export prices are typically fixed one to three months ahead of production, while prices for externally procured raw materials are fixed immediately prior to the month of production. This means that the full benefit of higher prices will not become fully apparent until the trend stabilises."
Management actions
Operations and sales:
CAPEX:
Financial management:
Full year to 31 December |
2009 | 2008 | Change |
Revenue | 9,772 | 20,380 | (52,1)% |
Adjusted EBITDA 1 | 1,237 | 6,215 | (80,1)% |
(Loss)/profit from operations | (1,047)* | 3,632 | |
Net (loss)/profit | (1,261)** | 1,859 | |
(Losses)/earnings per GDR 2, (US$) | (3,10) | 4,85 |
1 Refer to Attachment 1 for reconciliation to profit from operations
2 One share is represented by three GDRs
* (Loss)/profit from operations was adversely affected by US$1,346 million negative effect of the revaluation of property, plant and equipment, caused by changes in accounting policy. Excluding this effect there would have been an operating profit of US$299 million
** Net (loss)/profit was adversely affected by US$1,054 million negative effect of the revaluation of property, plant and equipment, caused by changes in accounting policy. Excluding this effect there would have been a net loss of US$207 million
2009 Results Summary:
Evraz's consolidated revenues decreased by 52.1% to US$9,772 million in 2009 compared with US$20,380 million in 2008. Steel segment sales accounted for the majority of the decrease in revenues, largely due to lower average prices and sales volumes of steel products. Evraz's sales volumes of steel products to third parties decreased from 17.0 million tonnes in 2008 to 14.3 million tonnes in 2009.
The decrease in steel sales volumes primarily relates to a decline in demand for construction products in Russia with overall sales in the Russian market down by 2.4 million tonnes. Sales volumes in Ukraine declined by 0.1 million tonnes. The decreases in the domestic markets were partially offset by the growth of export sales volumes from the Russian and Ukrainian operations, which increased by 0.8 million tonnes in total. Sales volumes of the European and South African operations declined by 0.3 million tonnes and 0.1 million tonnes respectively. The Canadian operations, which were acquired in June 2008, sold approximately the same steel volumes in 2009 as in 2008 post acquisition, while sales of the US operations decreased by 0.6 million tonnes. These decreases directly reflected the general slowdown in the steel markets in 2009 and related cuts in production volumes.
Geographic breakdown of consolidated revenues
Year ended 31 December | |||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 v 2008 | |||
US$ million | % of total | US$ million | % of total | % change | |
Russia | 2,950 | 30.2% | 7,575 | 37.2% | (61.1)% |
Americas | 2,428 | 24.8% | 4,538 | 22.3% | (46.5)% |
Asia | 2,423 | 24.8% | 3,217 | 15.8% | (24.7)% |
Europe | 1,028 | 10.5% | 2,862 | 14.0% | (64.1)% |
CIS | 543 | 5.6% | 1,429 | 7.0% | (62.0)% |
Africa | 381 | 3.9% | 720 | 3.5% | (47.1)% |
Rest of the world | 19 | 0.2% | 39 | 0.2% | (51.3)% |
Total | 9,772 | 100.0% | 20,380 | 100.0% | (52.1)% |
Full year to 31 December (US$ million unless otherwise stated) |
2009 | 2008 | Change |
Revenues* | 8,978 | 17,925 | (49.9)% |
(Loss)/profit from operations | (840) | 2,746 | (130.6)% |
Adjusted EBITDA | 903 | 4,671 | (80.7)% |
Adjusted EBITDA margin | 10.1% | 26.1% |
Year ended 31 December | |||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 v 2008 | |||
US$ million | % of total | US$ million | % of total | % change | |
Steel products | |||||
Construction products 1 | 2,189 | 24.4% | 4,958 | 27.7% | (55.8)% |
Railway products 2 | 1,117 | 12.4% | 2,226 | 12.4% | (49.8)% |
Flat-rolled products 3 | 1,450 | 16.2% | 3,239 | 18.1% | (55.2)% |
Tubular products 4 | 1,008 | 11.2% | 1,753 | 9.8% | (42.5)% |
Semi-finished products 5 | 2,018 | 22.5% | 3,512 | 19.6% | (42.5)% |
Other steel products 6 | 255 | 2.8% | 607 | 3.4% | (58.0)% |
Other products 7 | 941 | 10.5% | 1,630 | 9.1% | (42.3)% |
Total | 8,978 | 100.0% | 17,925 | 100.0% | (49.9)% |
Full year to 31 December (‘000 tonnes) |
2009 | 2008 | Change |
Steel products | |||
Construction products | 4,228 | 5,320 | (20.5)% |
Railway products | 1,592 | 2,438 | (34.7)% |
Flat-rolled products | 2,113 | 2,651 | (20.3)% |
Tubular products | 667 919 | (27.4)% | |
Semi-finished products | 5,273 | 5,188 | 1.6% |
Other steel products | 460 | 627 | (26.6)% |
Total | 14,333 | 17,143 | (16.4)% |
* Including intersegment sales
Steel segment revenues decreased by 49.9% to US$8,978 million in 2009 compared with US$17,925 million in 2008. This decline reflected negative price dynamics for steel products and lower
sales volumes.
The proportion of revenues attributable to sales of construction products decreased due to a significant decline in the sales volumes of construction products at the Russian operations.
The proportion of revenues attributable to sales of railway products remained unchanged despite a decrease in the proportion of volumes. This reflects the fact that prices of railway products decreased less than other steel products.
The proportion of revenues attributable to sales of flat-rolled products (primarily plate) decreased due to an above average decline in sales volumes compared with other steel products, particularly with regard to the European operations.
An increase in the proportion of revenues attributable to sales of tubular products reflects relatively stable tubular products in North America towards the end of 2008 and at the start of 2009, the result being a below average decline in the prices of tubular goods compared to other steel products.
The proportion of revenues attributable to sales of semi-finished products increased due to higher sales volumes of semis sold by the Russian and Ukrainian operations to export markets.
Steel segment sales to the mining segment amounted to US$83 million in 2009 compared with US$178 million in 2008. The decrease is attributable to lower sale prices and volumes.
Revenues from sales outside Russia amounted to approximately 70% of steel segment revenues in 2009, compared with 61% in 2008. The increased share of revenues from sales outside Russia in 2009 was primarily attributable to the reallocation of steel volumes from the Russian market to Asian export markets.
Steel segment cost of revenues totalled US$8,122 million, or 90.5% of steel segment revenues, in 2009 compared with US$12,662 million, or 70.6% of steel segment revenues, in 2008. The decrease is attributable to the decline in sales volumes and in the prices of raw materials together with staff optimisation measures and the depreciation of local currencies against the US dollar.
In 2009, the steel segment profit (loss) from operations changed to a loss of US$840 million compared with a profit of US$2,746 million in 2008.
In 2009, adjusted EBITDA in the steel segment totalled US$903 million, or 10.1% of steel segment revenues, compared with US$4,671 million, or 26.1% of steel segment revenues in 2008.
Mining Segment Results
Full year to 31 December (US$ million unless otherwise stated) |
2009 | 2008 | Chang |
Revenues | 1,456 | 3,634 | (59.9)% |
(Loss)/profit from operations | (214) | 971 | (122.0)% |
Adjusted EBITDA | 279 | 1,395 | (80.0)% |
Adjusted EBITDA margin | 19.2% | 38.4% |
Year ended 31 December | |||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 v 2008 | |||
US$ million | % of total | US$ million | % of total % | change | |
Iron ore products | 840 | 57.7% | 2,213 | 60.9% | (62.0)% |
Iron ore concentrate | 311 | 21.4% | 625 | 17.2% | (50.2)% |
Sinter | 158 | 10.9% | 885 | 24.4% | (82.1)% |
Pellets | 238 | 16.3% | 566 | 15.6% | (58.0)% |
Other | 133 | 9.1% | 137 | 3.8% | (2.9)% |
Coal products | 562 | 38.6% | 1,251 | 34.4% | (55.1)% |
Coking coal | 137 | 9.4% | 259 | 7.1% | (47.1)% |
Coal concentrate | 268 | 18.4% | 719 | 19.8% | (62.7)% |
Steam coal | 124 | 8.5% | 265 | 7.3% | (53.2)% |
Steam coal concentrate | 33 | 2.3% | 8 | 0.2% | 312.5% |
Other revenues | 54 | 3.7% | 170 | 4.7% | (68.2)% |
Total | 1,456 | 100.0% | 3,634 | 100.0% | (59.9)% |
Full year to 31 December (‘000 tonnes) |
2009 | 2008 | Change |
Iron ore products | 18,326 | 21,739 | (15.7)% |
Iron ore concentrate | 5,644 | 6,554 | (13.9)% |
Sinter | 3,253 | 7,860 | (58.6)% |
Pellets | 5,479 | 5,273 | 3.9% |
Other | 3,950 | 2,052 | 92.5% |
Coal products | 11,634 | 11,703 | (0.6)% |
Coking coal | 3,967 | 3,117 | 27.3% |
Coal concentrate | 3,795 | 4,370 | (13.2)% |
Steam coal | 3,411 | 4,110 | (17.0)% |
Steam coal concentrate | 461 | 106 | 334.9% |
* Including intersegment sales
Mining segment revenues were down by 59.9% to US$1,456 million, compared with US$3,634 million in 2008, primarily reflecting a decline in average prices of iron ore and coal.
Sales volumes of iron ore products decreased by 15.7% in 2009 compared with 2008. Excluding the effect of the resale of iron ore products from UGOK (a related party) in 2008, sales volumes of iron ore in 2009 decreased by just 1.1% compared with 2008. Sales volumes of steam coal products decreased by 8.2% in 2009 compared with 2008, while sales volumes of coking coal increased by 3.7%.
In 2009 mining segment sales to the steel segment amounted to US$1,017 million, or 69.8% of mining segment sales, compared with US$2,340 million, or 64.4% of mining segment sales, in 2008.
Approximately 51% of the mining segment's third party sales in 2009 were to customers in Russia compared with 29% in 2008. The higher share of third party sales outside Russia in 2008 is largely attributable to the resale of iron ore from UGOK, a related party, to export markets. There were no such resales in 2009.
The mining segment cost of revenues decreased by 42.7% from US$2,387 million in 2008 to US$1,368 million in 2009, primarily due to the decrease in raw materials, transportation, staff, energy and other costs.
The mining segment profit (loss) from operations changed from a profit of US$971 million in 2008 to a loss of US$214 million in 2009.
Adjusted EBITDA in the mining segment decreased by 80.0% to US$279 million, or 19.2% of mining segment revenues in 2009, compared with US$1,395 million, or 38.4% of mining segment
revenues, in 2008.
Vanadium Segment Results
Full year to 31 December (US$ million unless otherwise stated) |
2009 | 2008 | Change |
Revenues | 363 | 1,206 | (69.9)% |
(Loss)/profit from operations | (48) | 170 | (128.2)% |
Adjusted EBITDA | 10 | 200 | (95.0)% |
Adjusted EBITDA margin | 2.8% | 16.6% |
Year ended 31 December | ||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 v 2008 | ||||
US$ million | % of total | US$ million | % of total | % change | ||
Vanadium in slag | 60 | 16.5% | 290 | 24.1% | (79.3)% | |
Vanadium in alloys and chemicals | 298 | 82.1% | 913 | 75.7% | (67.4)% | |
Other revenues | 5 | 1.4% | 3 | 0.2% | 66.7% | |
Total | 363 | 100.0% | 1,206 | 100.0% | (69.9)% |
Full year to 31 December |
2009 | 2008 | Change |
Vanadium products | 18.4 | 26.4 | (30.3)% |
Vanadium in slag | 6.5 | 10.3 | (36.9)% |
Vanadium in alloys and chemicals | 11.9 | 16.1 | (26.1)% |
* Including intersegment sales
Vanadium segment revenues decreased by 69.9% to US$363 million in 2009, compared with US$1,206 million in 2008. The decrease is attributable to significantly lower vanadium prices and sales volumes.
The vanadium segment cost of revenues fell by 60.7% from US$922 million in 2008 to US$362 million in 2009.
The vanadium segment profit (loss) from operations changed from a profit of US$170 million in 2008 to a loss of US$48 million in 2009.
Adjusted EBITDA in the vanadium segment totalled US$10 million in 2009 compared with US$200 million in 2008.
Other operations segment results
Full year to 31 December (US$ million unless otherwise stated) |
2009 | 2008 | Change |
Revenues | 765 | 1,022 | (25.1)% |
Profit from operations | 77 | 83 | (7.2)% |
Adjusted EBITDA | 167 | 150 | 11.3% |
Adjusted EBITDA margin | 21.8% | 14.7% |
# # #
For further information:
Media contact:
Alex Agoureev
VP, Public Relations
+7 985 122 4822
media@evraz.com
Investor contact:
Alexander Boreyko
Director, Investor Relations
+7 495 232 1370
ir@evraz.com
Attachment 1
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA represents profit from operations adjusted for depreciation, depletion and amortisation, impairment of assets and loss (gain) on disposal of property, plant and equipment, foreign exchange gains/(losses). Evraz presents an Adjusted EBITDA because it considers Adjusted EBITDA to be an important supplemental measure of its operating performance and believes Adjusted EBITDA is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of companies in the same industry. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under IFRS and it should not be considered as an alternative to net profit as a measure of operating performance or to cash flows from operating activities as a measure of liquidity. Evraz's calculation of Adjusted EBITDA may be different from the calculation used by other companies and therefore comparability may be limited. Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool and potential investors should not consider it in isolation, or as a substitute for an analysis of our operating results as reported under IFRS. Some of these limitations include:
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the impact of financing or financing costs on Evraz's operating performance, which can be significant and could further increase if Evraz were to incur more debt.
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the impact of income taxes on Evraz's operating performance.
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the impact of depreciation and amortisation on Evraz's operating performance. The assets of Evraz's businesses which are being depreciated and/or amortised will have to be replaced in the future and such depreciation and amortisation expense may approximate
‡
Please refer to Attachment 3 for calculation of net debt
the cost to replace these assets in the future. Adjusted EBITDA, due to the exclusion of this expense, does not reflect Evraz's future cash requirements for these replacements. Adjusted EBITDA also does not reflect the impact of a loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment.
Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to profit (loss) from operations is as follows:
Year ended 31 December | ||
2009 | 2008 | |
(US$ million) | ||
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA reconciliation | ||
(Loss)/profit from operations | (1,047) | 3,632 |
Add: | ||
Depreciation, depletion and amortisation | 1,632 | 1,195 |
Impairment of assets | 163 | 880 |
Loss on disposal of property, plant & equipment 81 37 | ||
Foreign exchange loss (gain) | (156) | 471 |
Revaluation deficit | 564 | - |
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA | 1,237 | 6,215 |
Steel segment Adjusted EBITDA reconciliation | ||
(Loss)/profit from operations | (840) | 2,746 |
Add: | ||
Depreciation and amortisation | 1,151 | 751 |
Impairment of assets | 168 | 821 |
Loss on disposal of property, plant & equipment | 56 | 11 |
Foreign exchange loss (gain) | (54) | 342 |
Revaluation deficit | 422 | - |
Steel segment Adjusted EBITDA | 903 | 4,671 |
Mining segment Adjusted EBITDA reconciliation | ||
(Loss)/profit from operations | (214) | 971 |
Add: | ||
Depreciation, depletion and amortisation | 368 | 363 |
Impairment of assets | (5) | 56 |
Loss on disposal of property, plant & equipment 19 15 | ||
Foreign exchange loss (gain) | (1) | (10) |
Revaluation deficit | 112 | - |
Mining segment Adjusted EBITDA |
Attachment 2
Liquidity
31 December 2009 |
31 December 2008 |
|
(US$ million) | ||
Liquidity Calculation | ||
Cash and cash equivalents | 675 | 930 |
Amounts available under credit facilities | 1,300 | 1,679 |
Short-term bank deposits | 22 | 25 |
Total estimated liquidity | 1,997 | 2,634 |
31 Decembe 2009 |
31 December 2008 |
|
(US$ million) | ||
Net Debt Calculation | ||
Add: | ||
Long-term loans, net of current portion | 5,931 | 6,064 |
Short-term loans and current portion of long-term loans | 1,992 | 3,922 |
Less: | ||
Short-term bank deposits | (22) | (25) |
Cash and cash equivalents | (675) | (930) |
Net Debt | 7,226 | 9,031 |